
Why Japan needs a new Animal Protection
Law
By Elizabeth Oliver, ARK
1999
Because it hasn't got one !
Japan is regarded
as one of the most technologically advanced and economically
wealthy nations in the world. Yet in terms of animal welfare
it ranks as a third world country. Somehow in the great
post-war Japanese miracle when peoples' lives and prosperity
improved beyond everyone's dreams, animal welfare got left
behind. Perhaps it is because animals have no voice and
no political clout that they have been ignored and abused
for so long. As people have got richer they have aquired
possessions and alongside cars and videos they have collected
expensive pedigree pets. These pets like other commodities
get bought at whim and discarded when they are no longer
fashionable or people get tired of them.
There is a law called
the Animal Protection and Control
Law (1973) which is primarily designed to protect people
from animals, not the other way around. It is so ineffective,
unknown (to authorities like the police) and therefore
unenforceable that it is generally referred to as the 'sieve'
law. It has no definition of cruelty and the handful of
truly terrible cases that have been prosecuted in nearly
30 years have been let off with a paltry 30,000 yen (US$
250) fine, less than one would get for stealing a bicycle.
Cases in need of prosecution or regulation
Individual cruelty
A lone
male sadist answers newspaper adverts offering free
dogs or puppies. He takes them home and slowly tortures
and multilates them, sometimes skinning them alive.
Their screams echo around the neighbourhood at night.
This has been going on for years !
Some people
report this to the police, who do nothing. Others
ask animal groups to help and this has led to prosecution
papers being prepared. Evidence is collected; a statement
by a veterinarian who treated one of the dogs plus
gruesome photos of the mutilated dog, tape recorded
evidence from neighbours who are afraid to show their
faces or give their names for fear of reprisals.
A strong case.
The result
: case is rejected through lack of evidence and is
not considered convincing enough to prove cruelty.
Hell holes
An old
woman 'collector' keeps over 60 dogs because she
'likes animals'. The numbers remain constant because
although the unneutered animals breed, many died
of malnutrition, disease , severe flea infestation
and mange. Many of these dogs are kept in tiny wire
cages, where they are barely able to stand up or
turn around. The shack with its leaking tin roof
is encrusted with feces and reeks of urine, in summer
it becomes a furnace. Result: The authorities say
there is nothing they can do because these dogs are
'privately owned' and because the place is located
far from other residences it is not considered a
health hazard.
Pet shops, breeders, animal traders
Most pet
owners buy their pets from pet shops. The business
thrives on these gullible impulse buyers. The 'stock'
they sell are bred, often in in backstreet or country
premises which are unregulated and hidden from public
view. The breeding animals are bred continuously
until they 'wear out' usually at around 5-6 years,
and are then disposed of. They spend their entire
lives in tiny squalid cages. The puppies or kittens
are removed when less than a month old, loaded into
boxes, transported long distances to city pet auctions
where they are pulled out , held up in front of noisy
crowds, taken back to the pet shops where they are
put on display until sold. As they grow bigger, their
price tag drops and when they can no longer turn
around they are taken to the public pound or killed
at the pet shop. Pet shops animals are mostly carrying
genetic deformities through irresponsible inbreeding.
Their pedigree papers are often faked. This traumatic
early start and lack of normal socialization results
in physically weak adults, prone to disease and with
a range of behavioural problems.
Conditions
at pet shops are also over-crowded and unhygienic
but anyone can open and run this business. No licencing,
no law and no inspection applies. Some pet shops
now deal in so-called 'exotic' pets, like wallabies,
penguins, wild cats, birds of prey, reptiles of all
kinds, tropical fish, tropical birds etc: some of
which are species protected by CITES. However there
is no law to prosecute a pet shop once the animals
have entered the country. Even if it were possible
it would be hard to find trained inspectors to decide
what was or was not an 'endangered species' .
Again there
is no regulation controlling animal traders who hold
wild animals ' in transit' (supposedly for up to
6 months but can last for years), while they wait
for a buyer, usually a zoo. Often the supply exceeds
the demand and the animals languish in terrible conditions
until they die.
Hokenshos (offices of Public Health
and Hygiene which run 'kanri centres' or pounds for controlling,
catching and exterminating stray animals):
There
is no public office dealing with the protection or
welfare of animals. They are classified as public
nuisances, unsanitary and disposed of in the same
way as garbage. Although the prefectural and city
kanri centres employ 'token' veterinarians to sit
in the office, they in practice do not handle the
animals let alone give treatment to sick or injured
animals or euthanize the suffering. The job of killing
is sub-contracted to outside companies who make money
on the side by selling animals to laboratories for
experiments or by selling the meat and hides.
The hokensho
catches dogs using crude wire nooses. These tighten
around their necks to strangulation point as they
struggle to escape. The old, the young, the sick,
the injured, and the vicious are all thrown into
the same truck which is as often as not without air-conditioning
meaning the dogs suffocate in the summer heat. Others
are brought in by their owners and puppies are often
stacked in boxes or vinyl bags outside the hokensho
where they slowly suffocate to death. Those that
survive, wait a mandatory three days before being
killed. The methods of killing range from electrocution,
to decompression, gas and until recently animals
were bludgeoned to death in country areas. All these
methods are classified as 'inhumane' by RSPCA guidelines
for euthanasia. Needless to say many animals die
from trauma and shock during transport and after
they reach the kanri centre. Some hokenshos are attempting
to give themselves a face-lift by calling themselves
'Doobutsu Aigo Centres' (Love animals centres) where
puppies are given to anyone that wants one. Others
have automated the killing process so that the animals
don't have to be handled at all but at the press
of a button the walls move to force them into the
next cell and eventually to the death cell, untouched
by human hand. Although huge amounts of public money
have been spent building these places, they are clearly
designed for the convenience of people working there,
not out of humane consideration for the animals.
|